In response to a question about copyright that noted that the line-drawing section was based upon a randomly downloaded sketch, I responded at the LO forum:
“Inspired by” often seems the maker’s plea for mercy; it does little if anything to defend against a claim of copyright violation. Should such a claim arise, then the maker needs to defend on the basis of “de minimus use” or “fair use”, if technical defenses aren’t available.
Re “humerous”, in American law, the operative, buzzword, phrase is, “parody”.
Parodies are protected speech under our 1st Amendment, and they are give wide latitude. That’s why Alec Baldwin can impersonate Trump, and arguably why Andy Warhol could do his soup cans. It’s also an argument that has been used when porn movies are based on legitimate productions, ex., Flesh Gordon.
(Not that Cambell’s objected …)
As per our prior conversation re the Turn Me Over cover, then, I would argue only about 5% of the original work was used and is not readily identifiable as same (alteration – perhaps such as you did, you co-conspirator/participant, you – can bolster this defense) and further that there was no copyright claimed (traditionally the “©” or ” ‘c. year” is used.)
I could even extend the “parody” argument in that “turn me over” relates a to a lesbian concept, also known as, “flipping”, basically referring to a roll reversal where the more “masculine” penetrating partner is herself (and often over strenuous objection) penetrated.
That, besides the obvious visual pun that the most immediate sex act would be the arguably less traditional.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »